z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
He forbead þæt hi ne weopon: A negative element in the þæt-clause introduced by a verb of prohibition
Author(s) -
Michiko Ogura
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
selim. sociedad española de lengua y literatura inglesa medieval/selim. sociedad española de lengua y literatura inglesa medieval
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2792-3878
pISSN - 1132-631X
DOI - 10.17811/selim.25.2020.21-36
Subject(s) - non finite clause , linguistics , verb , negation , dependent clause , syntax , element (criminal law) , theme (computing) , philosophy , history , computer science , political science , law , sentence , operating system
In ICEHL 20 at the University of Edinburgh, I made a report of my research on this theme. The present paper gives additional facts on the construction of a verb of negation followed by a þæt-clause with a negative element. What I try to exemplify is not a historical change from expletive negative to affirmative clause, but the facts that (i) the expletive negative was one of the correlative constructions based on Old English syntax and (ii) the affirmative clause was already found in early Old English together with the negative clause, even though the negative clause was frequent in late Old English to early Middle English and then decreased after late Middle English. The verb with negative import with a negated þæt-clause is, therefore, not an illogical expression but a stylistic device of combining the negation of the governing verb with the content of the governed, negated þæt-clause.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here