Open AccessEFFICACY OF CATHETER ABLATION FOR PERSISTENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS PRESENT WITH TACHY-BRADY SYNDROME
Author(s) -
Е. А. Арчаков,
Р. Е. Баталов,
С. Ю. Усенков,
М. С. Хлынин,
А. В. Сморгон,
С. В. Попов,
В. Е. Бабокин
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
kompleksnye problemy serdečno-sosudistyh zabolevanij
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2587-9537
pISSN - 2306-1278
DOI - 10.17802/2306-1278-2018-7-3-24-32
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , cardiology , sick sinus syndrome , catheter ablation , amiodarone , pulmonary vein , diabetes mellitus , ablation , intracardiac injection , surgery , endocrinology
Aim. To estimate the efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) present with atrial fibrillation and sick sinus syndrome (SSS) undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation. Methods. 56 patients (34 females) with persistent AF and SSS were enrolled in the study. The mean age of patients was 67.7±10.7 years. Dual chamber cardiac pacemaker with remote monitoring function were implanted in all patients. All the patients were assigned to two groups: Group 1 comprised 31 patients aged 67.3±9.6 years, and Group 2 comprised 25 patients aged 72.6±9.9 years, including 22 (39.2%) diabetic patients. 2-3 days after pacemaker implantation, group 1 patients underwent intracardiac electrophysiology study and RFA of the pulmonary vein ostia, mitral isthmus and the left atrial posterior wall. Group 2 patients received antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Results. 3 patients (9%) in Group 1 had recurrent AF within the 6-month follow-up. The efficacy of the RFA for AF was 55% (n = 17) 1 year after the indexed hospitalization. 8 patients had short paroxysmal attacks which gradually lessened and stopped after. 5 patients (21%) in Group 2 did not have any AF paroxysms within the 1-year follow-up (Х2 = 5.52, р = 0.02). All these patients received amiodarone as antiarrhythmic drug therapy, whereas the others had paroxysmal attacks. Frequent attacks in 10 patients (40%) led to a change in antiarrhythmic drug use. Hospital readmission rates for AF were 16% and 52%, respectively (Х2 = 4.15, р = 0.04). The impact of atrial and ventricular stimulation on the development of recurrent AF was statistically insignificant (atrial stimulation – X2 = 0.01, cc = 1, p = 0.90; ventricular stimulation – X2 = 0.15, cc = 1, p = 0.69). None paroxysmal attacks were recorded in 10 diabetic patients (45%) after the RFA within the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion. Catheter ablation for persistent AF and SSS treated with permanent pacemakers is highly effective and safe method. In addition, it is superior to pharmacological approach. The presence of T2D likely did not significantly affect the efficacy of RFA for persistent form of AF.