Open AccessINTERDISCIPLINARITY AND POLYFUNCTIONALITY IN THE SYSTEM OF CONCEPTS OF MODERN SCIENCE (BASED ON THE TERMS OF SOCIOLINGUISTICS, SOCIOLOGY, AND LINGUISTICS)
Author(s) -
A A Nemyka,
A. V. Sytina
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
istoričeskaâ i socialʹno-obrazovatelʹnaâ myslʹ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2219-6048
pISSN - 2075-9908
DOI - 10.17748/2075-9908-2018-10-3/2-120-124
Subject(s) - terminology , sociolinguistics , relevance (law) , relation (database) , sociology , field (mathematics) , epistemology , linguistics , realization (probability) , sociology of scientific knowledge , originality , social science , computer science , qualitative research , philosophy , statistics , mathematics , database , political science , pure mathematics , law
The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of realization of important properties of interdisciplinarity and polyfunctionality within the framework of the modern scientific conceptual paradigm. The study is based on the material of units functioning mainly within the term systems of sociolinguistics, sociology and linguistics. The relevance of the topic is due to the lack of development in modern science of the issues of systematic research of interdisciplinary integrative specificity of terminological usage. At the moment, we have accumulated a rich experience of describing languages of different Sciences, including new ones, which form their conceptual paradigm. However, researchers have so far not paid enough attention to such aspects of the terminology as its usual and specific features in the field of the existence of new scientific directions. The problem also lies in the fact that modern conceptual systems of sociolinguistics, sociology and linguistics are characterized by a number of specific features that manifest themselves in the field of their semantic connections and functional features. And if scientific research has already been created in relation to many terms, then in relation to the special units of these areas of such studies there is still not enough quantity for the problem to be considered resolved, reasoned and proven. The article cites the opinions of scientists, based on the provisions of modern methodology and terminology theory and practice. Based on such a study of the material, conclusions are drawn about the constitutive parameters of the terminological discourse under investigation.