z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison between modified LST Fastfloat and conventional HF methods for pollen preparation in highly minerogenic sediments
Author(s) -
Tiina Eskola,
Riitta Kontio,
Juha Pekka Lunkka
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
bulletin of the geological society of finland
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.4
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1799-4632
pISSN - 0367-5211
DOI - 10.17741/bgsf/93.1.001
Subject(s) - pollen , geology , vegetation (pathology) , hazardous waste , environmental science , physical geography , ecology , biology , geography , medicine , pathology
Pollen analysis is a commonly used method to interpret vegetation and environmental change. The standard pollen preparation technique in minerogenic sediments involves the use of hydrofluoric acid (HF) which is highly toxic. Currently the European legislation requires that hazardous chemicals should be substituted with less hazardous or non-toxic chemicals if possible. In the present paper the authors introduce a safer pollen preparation method, based on the use of low-toxic heavy liquid lithium heteropoly-tungstate (LST Fastfloat) and provide instructions for pollen preparation with the LSTFastflow method. Furthermore, five paired samples were processed from clayey and silty sediments with LST Fastfloat and conventional HF methods and the pollen and spore counting results obtained from these two methods were compared to test if there is statistically significant differences between the taxa. Calculation of the 95% confidence interval revealed statistical agreement in all studied taxa except one taxon in one sample pair. However, the study revealed systematic differences within two taxa, Betula and Pinus. Thus caution is needed when comparing results obtained by HF and heavy liquid (LST Fastfloat) methods.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here