Open AccessCyber-animism: the art of being alive in hybrid society
Author(s) -
Vladimir I. Arshinov,
Oleg Grimov,
Vadim Chekletsov
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
filosofskie problemy informacionnyh tehnologij i kiberprostranstva
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2305-3763
DOI - 10.17726/philit.2021.2.3
Subject(s) - process (computing) , computer science , digital revolution , constructive , knowledge management , creativity , human systems engineering , sociology , artificial intelligence , epistemology , data science , management science , engineering , psychology , social psychology , telecommunications , philosophy , operating system
The boundaries of social acceptance and models of convergence of human and non-human (for example, subjects of artificial intelligence) actors of digital reality are defined. The constructive creative possibilities of convergent processes in distributed neural networks are analyzed from the point of view of possible scenarios for building “friendly” human-dimensional symbioses of natural and artificial intelligence. A comprehensive analysis of new management challenges related to the development of cyber-physical and cybersocial systems is carried out. A model of social organizations and organizational behavior in the conditions of cyberphysical reality is developed. The possibilities of reconciling human moral principles and “machine ethics” in the processes of modeling and managing digital reality are studied. The significance of various concepts of digital, machine and cyber-anymism for the socio-cultural understanding of the development of modern cyber-physical technologies, the anthropological dimension of a smart city is revealed. The article introduces the concept of hybrid society and shows the development of its models as self-organizing collective systems that consist of co-evolving biohybrid and socio-technical spheres. The importance of modern anthropogenic research for sustainable development is analyzed. The process of marking ontological boundaries between heterogeneous modalities in the digital world is investigated. Examples of acute social contexts that are able to set the vector of practical philosophy in the modern digital era are considered.