Open AccessPRS IN US FOREIGN PRIORITIES AFTER THE PRESIDENCY ELECTIONS OF 2016
Author(s) -
Олександр Володимирович Шевчук
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
polìtologìčnij vìsnik
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2415-881X
DOI - 10.17721/2415-881x.2018.81.75-82
Subject(s) - presidency , presidential system , foreign policy , china , international relations , political science , complementarity (molecular biology) , politics , political economy , order (exchange) , foreign relations , law and economics , sociology , law , economics , genetics , finance , biology
The relevance of the study is conditioned by the importance of determining the new US Presidential Administration’s strategic foreign policy guidelines for developing their relations with the leading central-power states of the world, among which, considering the economic and political potential, the PRC occupies a special place. Apply the whole complex of philosophical general scientific, and specific methods of scientific research, which are inherent in political science, in their interconnection and complementarity. The main objectives of the study are to identify the main dimensions of the relationship between the US-China at the beginning of the presidential calendar D. Trump and predict the further evolution of the positioning of the United States and China in the regional and global system of international relations. In this article author makes an attempt to analyse possibilities for transformation of relations between USA and CPR from the beginning of D. Trump’s president cadence. The internal political and foreign policy determinants of the US-China relations mechanism are analyzed. The author makes the conclusion that it is quite realistic that the unbalance of relations in the format US-China can lead to an imbalance of the entire system of regional relations. Estimating the practical results of the meeting between US and Chinese leaders will be possible only after a certain period of time passes. At the moment, this meeting is evidence of the parties’ desire to reconcile their interests and open a dialogue at the highest level in order to prevent the extreme aggravation of relations. The additional destabilizing factors at the regional level are the «relics» of the Cold War: the Taiwan problem, controversial islands in the South China Sea, the Korean problem, etc. Washington’s and Beijing’s approaches to developing models for resolving these problems are quite different, which irritates the bilateral relationship. But with the prediction of the further evolution of US-China relations, it is necessary to take into account the so-called new improvisational style of US foreign policy that is characterized with high dynamism and unpredictability.