Open AccessThe Quality of Deliberation in Two Committees of the European Parliament: The Neglected Influence of the Situational Context and the Policymaking Stage
Author(s) -
Léa Roger,
Gary S. Schaal
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
politics and governance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.746
H-Index - 18
ISSN - 2183-2463
DOI - 10.17645/pag.v1i2.101
Subject(s) - deliberation , parliament , normative , situational ethics , quality (philosophy) , context (archaeology) , dimension (graph theory) , political science , positive economics , social psychology , psychology , epistemology , sociology , law , economics , politics , mathematics , paleontology , philosophy , pure mathematics , biology
In our paper we try to answer two empirical research questions. First, we assess the deliberative quality of discussions in two committees of the EU Parliament. In order to do so, we use a slightly revised version of the DQI. Second, we identify and empirically measure those variables that systematically influence the quality of deliberation in interviews with debate actors. We argue that the quality of deliberation in EU committees is influenced by two normative values: deliberation (common good orientation) and responsiveness (particular interest orientation), with the guiding value determined by the particular situation. Using a multidimensional concept of deliberation, we empirically test the impact of situational variables on specific aspects of deliberative quality. In addition, we take into account the temporal dimension of deliberation.