Nation Reification or “Nationalizing Nationalism” from the Perspective of International Law

National reication takes place when the state denes itself as a tool to protect the interests of a particular ethnic group and tries to create a homogeneous society unied on the basis of linguistic, cultural, historical, ideological and religious principles. This inevitably leads to the monopolization of politics (common good) by the majority’s culture, and at the same time, to the marginalization and exclusion of the minority’s culture and its obliteration in the future. This marginalization does not imply a discrimination because the minority is not denied civil rights, but its political activity from now on implies an engagement with the majority’s culture. This eect appears in waves. The rst wave preceded World War II; the second wave started in the nineties and aected the new post-Soviet and Eastern European countries. National reication is closely related to the principle of democracy; since the minority retains this obviously ineective right to participate, all other forms of protest become inaccessible to it. National reication is an objective and general tendency of the modern day. It lls the legitimacy decit and not only “launches” a new state, but also generates internal threats that justify its existence. As a result, from the very rst days, a new state is being created as a totalitarian and emergency one that can use extreme, but justied and legitimate measures. The principle of self-determination cannot be used against the process of national reication as it implies an obligation of conduct and has a narrow scope. Moreover, its beneciaries, by not being states, are deprived of the procedural tools needed to protect their rights. It could be interpreted dierently: we should recognize the right to secession for the nations faced with the choice of obeying or losing identity. This interpretation, however, is an unrealizable utopia. Human rights are completely helpless in the face of national reication or, rather, are indierent to it. The reason is a fundamental denial of the collective principle. Therefore, international law does not solve the problem of national reication. On the contrary, all the structures of the modern order (statehood, legitimacy, democracy, human rights, international law, etc.) generate this problem. The solution of the problem is vitally important and, at the same time, extremely dicult. It cannot be cosmetic, but should aect the very foundations of international law.