Open AccessN.F. Fedorov’s term system as an object of reflection in the personal encyclopedia
Author(s) -
N.V. Kozlovskaya
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
solovʹëvskie issledovaniâ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2076-9210
DOI - 10.17588/2076-9210.2020.2.154-165
Subject(s) - word formation , linguistics , neologism , phenomenon , term (time) , computer science , epistemology , metaphor , field (mathematics) , hierarchy , semantic analysis (machine learning) , originality , artificial intelligence , sociology , philosophy , mathematics , qualitative research , social science , physics , quantum mechanics , economics , pure mathematics , market economy
The article presents the results of the work on the description of the author's philosophical terminological system by N.F. Fedorov and analyzes the basic types of N.F. Fedorov philosophical terms and focuses on their creation methods. The basic principles of the internal organization of the author's philosophical terminological system are stated, its field character is justified. The ideas of the terminological system are substantiated, the core and the periphery are separately characterized. To identify key terms, methods of contextual analysis, frequency, corpus linguistics are used. To characterize the terms, linguistic methods for studying the following terms are used: componential analysis, combinatorial analysis, definitional analysis, and also a method for constructing paradigms. A general thematic classification of special vocabulary is proposed. The analysis of the methods of term formation is presented, a characteristic of each method is given: semantic term formation and its varieties, syntactic and word-formation methods. The phenomenon of term acquisition is separately analyzed. Particular attention is paid to the phenomenon of intersystem interaction that accompanies semantic term formation. Author’s neologisms are pointed out, ways of their formation and features of functioning are considered. The analysis of textual paradigmatic connections is given (terminological opposition, hyponymy, synonymy), associative-derivative connections of key terms are revealed. In conclusion, the main discursive practice of defining concepts is briefly characterized: definability by the whole text and metaphor. Conclusions about the qualitative and quantitative originality of the analyzed author's philosophical terms and the specifics of the author's term system are made.