z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Man, nature, death of V.S. Solovyov and A. Schopenhauer
Author(s) -
А. Buller
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
solovʹëvskie issledovaniâ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2076-9210
DOI - 10.17588/2076-9210.2020.2.006-022
Subject(s) - epistemology , philosophy , reverence , pity , natural (archaeology) , transcendental number , parallels , objectivity (philosophy) , instinct , compassion , psychology , social psychology , theology , mechanical engineering , archaeology , evolutionary biology , biology , engineering , history
In this article the question about the influence of the natural sciences on the philosophical concepts of Arthur Schopenhauer and Vladimir Solovyov was raised. The influence of Kantian transcendental criticism on Schopenhauer's philosophy was studied. It was shown that this influence manifested itself very vividly in the Schopenhauer concept of «will to live». It was established that the ontological status of man as a «phenomenon» had an impact both on Schopenhauer's concept of death and on his ethics of compassion. It was emphasized that the natural world plays an important role in Soloviev’s philosophical concept. According to Soloviev the nature of a person is determined by three needs: «animals, mental and heart», while the ontological basis of all these three needs is life, that is, the ability to «exist». It was indicated that the moral feelings of a person justified by Soloviev – shame, conscience, pity, and reverence – are a kind of human «response» of a rational being to its natural instincts and needs. The parallels between the philosophical views of Schopenhauer and Solovyov were drawn. On the basis of this parallels it was concluded that, despite the significant differences in the worldview of these two very different thinkers in nature, their approach to philosophy was largely identical and was characterized by scientific objectivity, interdisciplinarity, the skill of argumentation, the sharpness of the mind, the desire to give reasonable answers to the «last questions» of philosophy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here