z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue
Author(s) -
Christopher W. Tindale
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
co-herencia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.109
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 2539-1208
pISSN - 1794-5887
DOI - 10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.6
Subject(s) - deliberation , argumentation theory , rhetorical question , rhetoric , epistemology , odds , persuasion , sociology , psychology , social psychology , politics , political science , computer science , linguistics , philosophy , law , logistic regression , machine learning
The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation. Argumentation takes place “out there”, modifying the environments in which audiences operate. Equally interesting is the use of self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy. Arguing with oneself, especially when that self is distanced in some way from the individual involved, employs self-deliberation beyond the ends that Perelman assigned to it. In this paper, my goal is to explore the nature of the self-deliberator as an audience and self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy employed in argumentation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here