Open AccessDistinguishing between ontology and ‘decolonisation as praxis’
Author(s) -
Siseko H. Kumalo
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
tydskrif vir letterkunde
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.15
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 2309-9070
pISSN - 0041-476X
DOI - 10.17159/tl.v58i1.10361
Subject(s) - decolonization , praxis , scholarship , reading (process) , indigenous , ontology , criticism , agency (philosophy) , critical reading , postcolonialism (international relations) , sociology , epistemology , history , literature , philosophy , political science , linguistics , gender studies , social science , law , art , politics , ecology , biology
In this review article I closely read the recently published book African Philosophical and Literary Possibilities: Re-reading the Canon (2020), edited by Aretha Phiri. I suggest two ways of reading the text. The first levels a critique at some of the conflations we find in the text and the second showcases the useful takeaways that the reader gleans from the book. These takeaways are not—themselves—without criticisms, however. Such criticism is generative in that it shores up the work that still remains to be addressed by those working in the decolonial tradition, both here at home (i.e., in the South Africa academe) and further afield. In sum, I demonstrate that the objectives of decolonisation are clearly discernible when we apply ourselves to scholarship developed in the Indigenous languages of South Africa.