Open Access
Breach of Promise to Marry Under Customary Law
Author(s) -
Siyabonga Sibisi
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
obiter (port elizabeth. online)/obiter (port elizabeth)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2709-555X
pISSN - 1682-5853
DOI - 10.17159/obiter.v40i2.11267
Subject(s) - legal guardian , law , subject (documents) , damages , political science , family law , constitution , common law , sociology , library science , computer science
The purpose of this note is to look at breach of promise to marry, or breach of an engagement, under customary law. The note commences with a brief discussion of the common law and its development on the subject of promise to marry. This is followed by an enquiry into whether, under customary law, there is such a thing as a promise to marry, as we have come to know it, and if so, what the consequences of such a breach are. After this, the question discussed is who could claim following a breach of promise to marry. This is important because, under customary law, unmarried women were under the guardianship of their fathers or the eldest male in the family. Consequently, a father or eldest male in the family enjoyed the exclusive right to claim damages in a semi-personal capacity for a wrong committed against his daughter. After the expositions outlined above, this note then considers whether the customary law on a promise to marry is in need of development to bring it into line with the Constitution and how that development should take place.