Open AccessJOB SECURITY FOR DISABLED WORKERS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SOUTH AFRICA AND AUSTRALIA
Author(s) -
Nicola Smit,
Robert Guthrie
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
obiter (port elizabeth. online)/obiter (port elizabeth)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2709-555X
pISSN - 1682-5853
DOI - 10.17159/obiter.v29i3.12615
Subject(s) - dismissal , unfair dismissal , legislation , job security , equity (law) , work (physics) , workers' compensation , compensation (psychology) , business , occupational safety and health , employment contract , labour economics , labour law , political science , economics , psychology , law , engineering , social psychology , mechanical engineering
This contribution considers issues arising from the incapacity of an employee as a result of an occupational injury or disease and the often resultant termination of the contract of employment due to an unavoidable long absence from work. A comparative approach is adopted with specific reference to the South African and Australian regulation of such cases. These cases may be divided into two main categories, namely protection against dismissal and job insecurity and then also the health and safety of workers at the workplace. Both aspects are the subject of Conventions and Recommendations of the International Labour Organisation. The similarities of the two approaches are compared (for example the protection available against unfair dismissal and unfair discrimination in labour and equity legislation) but divergences are also indicated. In particular the absence of “return to work” provisions, management of occupational injuries and the reintegration of persons injured at work in South Africa, as well as the compensation available in appropriate instances.