Open AccessBETTER SAFE THAN SORRY: Magistrates’ views on the Domestic Violence Act
Author(s) -
Lillian Artz
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
sa crime quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2413-3108
pISSN - 1991-3877
DOI - 10.17159/2413-3108/2004/v0i7a1045
Subject(s) - domestic violence , subject (documents) , order (exchange) , law , political science , psychology , business , suicide prevention , medicine , poison control , computer science , medical emergency , finance , library science
As part of an ongoing project to monitor the implementation of the Domestic Violence Act, this article focuses on the role of magistrates. The impression exists that magistrates have a tendency to judge domestic violence matters conservatively. But research shows that most take a ‘better safe, than sorry’ approach in granting particular conditions in protection orders. The general sentiment is that it makes more sense to have an allinclusive protection order than one that will be subject to variation at a later stage.