
Population genetics, species boundaries, and conservation in the Magnolia pacifica species complex along a continentality and moisture gradient in western Mexico
Author(s) -
Miguel Ángel Muñiz-Castro,
Patricia Castro-Félix,
Ahtziri Socorro Carranza-Aranda,
J. Antonio Vázquez-García,
Anne Santerre
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
botanical sciences/botanical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.289
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 2007-4476
pISSN - 2007-4298
DOI - 10.17129/botsci.2551
Subject(s) - upgma , genetic diversity , biology , gene flow , endangered species , isolation by distance , analysis of molecular variance , population , taxon , genetic structure , lineage (genetic) , ecology , population genetics , genetic variation , zoology , habitat , demography , genetics , gene , sociology
Background: In western Mexico, the Magnolia pacifica complex includes three morphologically defined, endemic and, endangered species, distributed along a 215 km continentality and moisture gradient: Magnolia pugana, M. pacifica s.s., and M. vallartensis.
Hypothesis: Genetic evidence supports the taxonomical classification of the M. pacifica complex.
Study site and dates: Western Mexico, samples were collected in 2012-2015.
Methods: Six Inter-Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) primers amplified 76 clear and reproducible fragments in 278 individuals from 10 localities representative of the M. pacifica complex. ISSR dataset was analyzed using STRUCTURE 2.3.4, UPGMA clustering, Barrier 2.2, and AMOVA. Genetic diversity parameters were also estimated.
Results: Genetic analyses revealed two main groups: M. pugana and M. pacifica s.s.–M. vallartensis. Two subpopulations within each group were evidenced, particularly M. pacifica s.s. was separated from M. vallartensis. Geographical barriers to gene flow were identified. AMOVA revealed a similar and significant proportion of variation between and within groups. M. pugana has lower genetic diversity and higher differentiation than the M. pacifica s.s-M. vallartensis group.
Conclusions: Our results support the recognition of M. pugana as a genetically distinct lineage from M. pacifica s.s and M. vallartensis, but did not reveal a clear species boundary between the last two taxa. Geographical barriers and distance isolation might explain the genetic structure and differentiation pattern within the M. pacifica s.s. species complex. All main groups and subgroups defined in this study should be considered as separate conservation units, and concerted efforts are needed to protect them.