z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
El análisis filogenético: métodos, problemas y perspectivas
Author(s) -
Luis Enrique Eguiarte Fruns,
Valeria Souza,
Juan NúñezFarfán,
Blanca Hernández Baños
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
botanical sciences/botan‪ical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.289
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 2007-4476
pISSN - 2007-4298
DOI - 10.17129/botsci.1528
Subject(s) - humanities , philosophy
In the last century, Darwin and Haeckel were the first to propose the phylogenetic trees. The first phylogenies were made intuitively, but in the fifties several researchers tried to propose rules for their reconstruction. The evolutionary school in tended to use the principies of evolution, the numerical (or pheneticist) school advanced the "distance methods", while the cladistic school proposed the "parsimony method". The UPGMA and the Neighbor:Joining are the more commonly used distance methods. The parsimony method tries to find the tree that requires the smallest number of changes. There are other methods that take in to account the evolutionary forces, like the maximum likelihood (Felsenstein, 1981). In this paper we discuss some of the problems associated to phylogeny reconstruction, the advantages of the different methods and of some of the computer available programs, and finally we offer a perspective on the uses of the phylogenies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here