El análisis filogenético: métodos, problemas y perspectivas
Author(s) -
Luis E. Eguiarte,
Valeria Souza,
Juan NúñezFarfán
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
botanical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.289
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 2007-4476
pISSN - 2007-4298
DOI - 10.17129/botsci.1528
Subject(s) - maximum parsimony , cladistics , phylogenetic tree , upgma , darwin (adl) , perspective (graphical) , phylogenetics , tree (set theory) , maximum likelihood , computer science , mathematics , evolutionary biology , artificial intelligence , biology , combinatorics , statistics , sociology , demography , clade , population , biochemistry , software engineering , gene , genetic diversity
In the last century, Darwin and Haeckel were the first to propose the phylogenetic trees. The first phylogenies were made intuitively, but in the fifties several researchers tried to propose rules for their reconstruction. The evolutionary school in tended to use the principies of evolution, the numerical (or pheneticist) school advanced the "distance methods", while the cladistic school proposed the "parsimony method". The UPGMA and the Neighbor:Joining are the more commonly used distance methods. The parsimony method tries to find the tree that requires the smallest number of changes. There are other methods that take in to account the evolutionary forces, like the maximum likelihood (Felsenstein, 1981). In this paper we discuss some of the problems associated to phylogeny reconstruction, the advantages of the different methods and of some of the computer available programs, and finally we offer a perspective on the uses of the phylogenies.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom