Open AccessLearning Outcomes of a National Level Project Contest
Author(s) -
Rajeshwari Hegde,
M. K. Prasanna Kumar,
Gopalan Oppiliappan
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of engineering education/journal of engineering education transformations/journal of engineering education transformation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2349-2473
pISSN - 0971-5843
DOI - 10.16920/jeet/2020/v34i2/146590
Subject(s) - contest , rubric , quality (philosophy) , engineering management , engineering , public relations , knowledge management , medical education , computer science , psychology , pedagogy , political science , medicine , law , philosophy , epistemology
Today, industry needs highly skilled engineering graduates to combat real world challenges in an efficient manner. The mere knowledge of theoretical concepts would not help the students to solve the global challenges. As such, nurturing young minds to appreciate complex problems and to think of innovative solutions either to alleviate prevalent problems or to improve the quality of life become the responsibility of technical institutions. The project contests to showcase the talents would help the students to exhibit their skills and project their ideas with peers and also with the industry experts. In this paper, the learning outcomes of one such national level project contest TELECOMBAT, held at the Department of Telecommunication Engineering, BMS College of Engineering, Bangalore has been presented. The contest aimed to bring together industry and academia experts to strengthen the industry-institution interaction and also to get the students' projects evaluated by the industry experts which would help the students to understand the need for implementing quality projects to excel in their professional career. The suggestions given by the experts have been incorporated for evaluating student's projects for the successive years. The rigorous evaluation of the projects involved three rounds with different rubrics for each round. This event provided a platform for institute and industry iteration and also helped students to get first hand feedback from experts and researchers.