z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Molecular Subtyping of Triple‐Negative Breast Cancers by Immunohistochemistry: Molecular Basis and Clinical Relevance
Author(s) -
Zhao Shen,
Ma Ding,
Xiao Yi,
Li XiaoMei,
Ma JianLi,
Zhang Han,
Xu XiaoLi,
Lv Hong,
Jiang WenHua,
Yang WenTao,
Jiang YiZhou,
Zhang QingYuan,
Shao ZhiMing
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the oncologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.176
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1549-490X
pISSN - 1083-7159
DOI - 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0982
Subject(s) - immunohistochemistry , subtyping , androgen receptor , medicine , pathology , breast cancer , tumor infiltrating lymphocytes , cancer research , biology , oncology , cancer , immunotherapy , prostate cancer , computer science , programming language
Abstract Background Molecular subtyping of triple‐negative breast cancers (TNBCs) via gene expression profiling is essential for understanding the molecular essence of this heterogeneous disease and for guiding individualized treatment. We aim to devise a clinically practical method based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the molecular subtyping of TNBCs. Materials and Methods By analyzing the RNA sequencing data on TNBCs from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) ( n = 360) and The Cancer Genome Atlas data set ( n = 158), we determined markers that can identify specific molecular subtypes. We performed immunohistochemical staining on tumor sections of 210 TNBCs from FUSCC, established an IHC‐based classifier, and applied it to another two cohorts ( n = 183 and 214). Results We selected androgen receptor (AR), CD8, FOXC1, and DCLK1 as immunohistochemical markers and classified TNBCs into five subtypes based on the staining results: (a) IHC‐based luminal androgen receptor (IHC‐LAR; AR‐positive [+]), (b) IHC‐based immunomodulatory (IHC‐IM; AR‐negative [−], CD8+), (c) IHC‐based basal‐like immune‐suppressed (IHC‐BLIS; AR−, CD8−, FOXC1+), (d) IHC‐based mesenchymal (IHC‐MES; AR−, CD8−, FOXC1−, DCLK1+), and (e) IHC‐based unclassifiable (AR−, CD8−, FOXC1−, DCLK1−). The κ statistic indicated substantial agreement between the IHC‐based classification and mRNA‐based classification. Multivariate survival analysis suggested that our IHC‐based classification was an independent prognostic factor for relapse‐free survival. Transcriptomic data and pathological observations implied potential treatment strategies for different subtypes. The IHC‐LAR subtype showed relative activation of HER2 pathway. The IHC‐IM subtype tended to exhibit an immune‐inflamed phenotype characterized by the infiltration of CD8+ T cells into tumor parenchyma. The IHC‐BLIS subtype showed high expression of a VEGF signature. The IHC‐MES subtype displayed activation of JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway. Conclusion We developed an IHC‐based approach to classify TNBCs into molecular subtypes. This IHC‐based classification can provide additional information for prognostic evaluation. It allows for subgrouping of TNBC patients in clinical trials and evaluating the efficacy of targeted therapies within certain subtypes. Implications for Practice An immunohistochemistry (IHC)‐based classification approach was developed for triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC), which exhibited substantial agreement with the mRNA expression‐based classification. This IHC‐based classification (a) allows for subgrouping of TNBC patients in large clinical trials and evaluating the efficacy of targeted therapies within certain subtypes, (b) will contribute to the practical application of subtype‐specific treatment for patients with TNBC, and (c) can provide additional information beyond traditional prognostic factors in relapse prediction.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here