Open AccessThe Development of an International Oncofertility Competency Framework: A Model to Increase Oncofertility Implementation
Author(s) -
Anazodo Antoinette,
Laws Paula,
Logan Shanna,
Saunders Carla,
Travaglia Jo,
Gerstl Brigitte,
Bradford Natalie,
Cohn Richard,
Birdsall Mary,
Barr Ronald,
Suzuki Nao,
Takae Seido,
Marinho Ricardo,
Xiao Shuo,
Chen QiongHua,
Mahajan Nalini,
Patil Madhuri,
Gunasheela Devika,
Smith Kristen,
Sender Leonard,
Melo Cláudia,
AlmeidaSantos Teresa,
Salama Mahmoud,
Appiah Leslie,
Su Irene,
Lane Sheila,
Woodruff Teresa K.,
Pacey Allan,
Anderson Richard A.,
Shenfield Francoise,
Sullivan Elizabeth,
Ledger William
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the oncologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.176
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1549-490X
pISSN - 1083-7159
DOI - 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0043
Subject(s) - oncofertility , medicine , fertility preservation , psychosocial , delphi method , family medicine , referral , survivorship curve , service (business) , documentation , nursing , fertility , cancer , population , statistics , mathematics , environmental health , economy , psychiatry , computer science , economics , programming language
Background Despite international evidence about fertility preservation (FP), several barriers still prevent the implementation of equitable FP practice. Currently, oncofertility competencies do not exist. The aim of this study was to develop an oncofertility competency framework that defines the key components of oncofertility care, develops a model for prioritizing service development, and defines the roles that health care professionals (HCPs) play. Materials and Method A quantitative modified Delphi methodology was used to conduct two rounds of an electronic survey, querying and synthesizing opinions about statements regarding oncofertility care with HCPs and patient and family advocacy groups (PFAs) from 16 countries (12 high and 4 middle income). Statements included the roles of HCPs and priorities for service development care across ten domains (communication, oncofertility decision aids, age‐appropriate care, referral pathways, documentation, oncofertility training, reproductive survivorship care and fertility‐related psychosocial support, supportive care, and ethical frameworks) that represent 33 different elements of care. Results The first questionnaire was completed by 457 participants (332 HCPs and 125 PFAs). One hundred and thirty‐eight participants completed the second questionnaire (122 HCPs and 16 PFAs). Consensus was agreed on 108 oncofertility competencies and the roles HCPs should play in oncofertility care. A three‐tier service development model is proposed, with gradual implementation of different components of care. A total of 92.8% of the 108 agreed competencies also had agreement between high and middle income participants. Conclusion FP guidelines establish best practice but do not consider the skills and requirements to implement these guidelines. The competency framework gives HCPs and services a structure for the training of HCPs and implementation of care, as well as defining a model for prioritizing oncofertility service development. Implications for Practice Despite international evidence about fertility preservation (FP), several barriers still prevent the implementation of equitable FP practice. The competency framework gives 108 competencies that will allow health care professionals (HCPs) and services a structure for the development of oncofertility care, as well as define the role HCPs play to provide care and support. The framework also proposes a three‐tier oncofertility service development model which prioritizes the development of components of oncofertility care into essential, enhanced, and expert services, giving clear recommendations for service development. The competency framework will enhance the implementation of FP guidelines, improving the equitable access to medical and psychological oncofertility care.