Open AccessHybrid Capture‐Based Genomic Profiling Identifies BRAF V600 and Non‐V600 Alterations in Melanoma Samples Negative by Prior Testing
Author(s) -
Boussemart Lise,
Nelson Annie,
Wong Michael,
Ross Jeffrey S.,
Sosman Jeffrey,
Mehnert Janice,
Daniels Gregory,
Kendra Kari,
Ali Siraj Mahamed,
Miller Vincent A.,
Schrock Alexa B.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the oncologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.176
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1549-490X
pISSN - 1083-7159
DOI - 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0271
Subject(s) - melanoma , medicine , metastatic melanoma , targeted therapy , mek inhibitor , oncology , cancer research , computational biology , cancer , mapk/erk pathway , biology , genetics , kinase
Background BRAF and MEK inhibitors are approved for BRAF V600‐mutated advanced melanoma, with response rates of up to 70%. Responses to targeted therapies have also been observed for diverse non‐V600 BRAF alterations. Thus, sensitive, accurate, and broad detection of BRAF alterations is critical to match patients with available targeted therapies. Materials and Methods Pathology reports were reviewed for 385 consecutive melanoma cases with BRAF mutations or rearrangements identified using a hybrid capture‐based next‐generation sequencing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay during the course of clinical care. Results Records of prior BRAF molecular testing were available for 79 (21%) cases. Of cases with BRAF V600 mutations, 11/57 (19%) with available data were negative by prior BRAF testing. Prior negative BRAF results were also identified in 16/20 (80%) cases with non‐V600 mutations, 2 of which harbored multiple BRAF alterations, and in 2/2 (100%) cases with activating BRAF fusions. Clinical outcomes for a subset of patients are presented. Conclusion CGP identifies diverse activating BRAF alterations in a significant fraction of cases with prior negative testing. Given the proven clinical benefit of BRAF/MEK inhibitors in BRAF‐mutated melanoma, CGP should be considered for patients with metastatic melanoma, particularly if other testing is negative. Implications for Practice Published guidelines for melanoma treatment recommend BRAF mutational analysis, but little guidance is provided as to selection criteria for testing methodologies, or as to clinical implications for non‐V600 alterations. This study found that hybrid capture‐based next‐generation sequencing can detect BRAF alterations in samples from a significant fraction of patients with advanced melanoma with prior negative BRAF results. This study highlights the need for oncologists and pathologists to be critically aware of coverage and sensitivity limitations of various assays, particularly regarding non‐V600E alterations, of which many are potentially targetable.