z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cabozantinib in Patients with Advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma
Author(s) -
Rabinowits Guilherme,
Lezcano Cecilia,
Catalano Paul J.,
McHugh Patricia,
Becker Hailey,
Reilly Megan M.,
Huang Julian,
Tyagi Ayushi,
Thakuria Manisha,
Bresler Scott C.,
Sholl Lynette M.,
Shapiro Geoffrey I.,
Haddad Robert,
DeCaprio James A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the oncologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.176
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1549-490X
pISSN - 1083-7159
DOI - 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0552
Subject(s) - medicine , cabozantinib , clinical endpoint , merkel cell carcinoma , toxicity , adverse effect , oncology , rash , clinical trial , surgery , carcinoma , cancer
Background This study sought to determine the efficacy and safety profile of cabozantinib in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Experimental Design This prospective, phase II, single‐institution trial enrolled patients with platinum‐failure, recurrent/metastatic MCC to receive cabozantinib 60 mg orally daily until disease progression, withdrawal from study, or severe toxicity. The primary endpoint was disease control rate. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Immunohistochemistry for VEGFR‐2, MET, and HGF expression and next‐generation sequencing of tumor tissue were performed and correlated with outcome. Results Eight patients were accrued from January 24, 2014, to June 8, 2016. The study was closed prematurely because of toxicity and lack of responses. The most frequent adverse events were grades 1 and 2 and included anorexia, fatigue, nausea, hypothyroidism, and dysgeusia. Two patients developed nonhealing, painful ulcers and tumor‐skin fistula. One patient had stable disease for 8 months. One patient withdrew from the study after 2 weeks of therapy because of adverse events. Three patients required dose reduction because of toxicity. Median PFS and OS were 2.1 and 11.2 months, respectively. No expression of MET, HGF, or VEGFR‐2 was identified in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry of patients’ tissue samples. Conclusion Cabozantinib was poorly tolerated and did not demonstrate activity in patients with recurrent/metastatic, platinum‐failure MCC. It is unclear whether preselection of patients with the specific upregulation or genetic alteration in the targets for cabozantinib would have changed the results of this study. (Clinical trial identification number: NCT02036476) Implications for Practice This phase II study demonstrated poor tolerability and lack of activity of cabozantinib in an unselected group of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. Although it is unclear whether preselection of patients with the specific upregulation and genetic alterations in targets for cabozantinib would have changed the results of this study, this would have likely led to an extremely rare patient population that would take many years to accrue.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here