Open AccessLow Socioeconomic Status Is Associated With More Aggressive End‐of‐Life Care for Working‐Age Terminal Cancer Patients
Author(s) -
Chang ChunMing,
Wu ChinChia,
Yin WenYao,
Juang ShiunYang,
Yu ChiaHui,
Lee ChingChih
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the oncologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.176
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1549-490X
pISSN - 1083-7159
DOI - 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0152
Subject(s) - medicine , socioeconomic status , end of life care , cancer , logistic regression , disease , intensive care unit , emergency department , health care , emergency medicine , palliative care , gerontology , environmental health , population , nursing , economics , economic growth
Background. The relationship between low socioeconomic status (SES) and aggressiveness of end‐of‐life (EOL) care in cancer patients of working age (older than 18 years and younger than 65 years) is not clear. We assessed the association between aggressiveness of EOL care and differences in SES among working‐age terminal cancer patients from Taiwan between 2009 and 2011. Methods. A total of 32,800 cancer deaths were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The indicators of aggressive EOL care (chemotherapy, more than one emergency room [ER] visit or hospital admission, more than 14 days of hospitalization, intensive care unit [ICU] admission, and death in an acute care hospital) in the last month of life were examined. The associations between SES and the indicators were explored. Results. Up to 81% of the cancer deaths presented at least one indicator of aggressive EOL care. Those who were aged 35–44 years and male, had low SES, had metastatic malignant disease, lived in urban areas, or were in hospitals with more abundant health care resources were more likely to receive aggressive EOL care. In multilevel logistic regression analyses, high‐SES cancer deaths had less chemotherapy ( p < .001), fewer ER visits ( p < .001), fewer ICU admissions ( p < .001), and lower rates of dying in acute hospitals ( p < .001) compared with low‐SES cancer deaths. Conclusion. Working‐age terminal cancer patients in Taiwan received aggressive EOL care. EOL cancer care was even more aggressive in those with low SES. Public health strategies should continue to focus on low‐SES patients to provide them with better EOL cancer care.