Open Access
Survey and Evaluation of Causal Discovery Methods for Time Series
Author(s) -
Charles K. Assaad,
Émilie Devijver,
Éric Gaussier
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of artificial intelligence research/the journal of artificial intelligence research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.79
H-Index - 123
eISSN - 1943-5037
pISSN - 1076-9757
DOI - 10.1613/jair.1.13428
Subject(s) - computer science , causality (physics) , series (stratigraphy) , task (project management) , constraint (computer aided design) , machine learning , field (mathematics) , artificial intelligence , time series , data mining , mathematics , management , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics , economics , biology , paleontology , physics , geometry
We introduce in this survey the major concepts, models, and algorithms proposed so far to infer causal relations from observational time series, a task usually referred to as causal discovery in time series. To do so, after a description of the underlying concepts and modelling assumptions, we present different methods according to the family of approaches they belong to: Granger causality, constraint-based approaches, noise-based approaches, score-based approaches, logic-based approaches, topology-based approaches, and difference-based approaches. We then evaluate several representative methods to illustrate the behaviour of different families of approaches. This illustration is conducted on both artificial and real datasets, with different characteristics. The main conclusions one can draw from this survey is that causal discovery in times series is an active research field in which new methods (in every family of approaches) are regularly proposed, and that no family or method stands out in all situations. Indeed, they all rely on assumptions that may or may not be appropriate for a particular dataset.