z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from a Survey of Machine Learning Researchers
Author(s) -
Zhang Baobao,
Markus Anderljung,
Lauren Kahn,
Noemi Dreksler,
Michael C. Horowitz,
Allan Dafoe
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of artificial intelligence research/˜the œjournal of artificial intelligence research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.79
H-Index - 123
eISSN - 1943-5037
pISSN - 1076-9757
DOI - 10.1613/jair.1.12895
Subject(s) - relevance (law) , artificial intelligence , corporate governance , work (physics) , political science , private sector , public relations , public sector , psychology , sociology , computer science , engineering , management , law , economics , mechanical engineering
Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) researchers play an important role in the ethics and governance of AI, including through their work, advocacy, and choice of employment. Nevertheless, this influential group's attitudes are not well understood, undermining our ability to discern consensuses or disagreements between AI/ML researchers. To examine these researchers' views, we conducted a survey of those who published in two top AI/ML conferences (N = 524). We compare these results with those from a 2016 survey of AI/ML researchers (Grace et al., 2018) and a 2018 survey of the US public (Zhang & Dafoe, 2020). We find that AI/ML researchers place high levels of trust in international organizations and scientific organizations to shape the development and use of AI in the public interest; moderate trust in most Western tech companies; and low trust in national militaries, Chinese tech companies, and Facebook. While the respondents were overwhelmingly opposed to AI/ML researchers working on lethal autonomous weapons, they are less opposed to researchers working on other military applications of AI, particularly logistics algorithms. A strong majority of respondents think that AI safety research should be prioritized and that ML institutions should conduct pre-publication review to assess potential harms. Being closer to the technology itself, AI/ML researchers are well placed to highlight new risks and develop technical solutions, so this novel attempt to measure their attitudes has broad relevance. The findings should help to improve how researchers, private sector executives, and policymakers think about regulations, governance frameworks, guiding principles, and national and international governance strategies for AI. This article appears in the special track on AI & Society.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here