Premium
Significant Decrease in Nelfinavir Systemic Exposure After Omeprazole Coadministration in Healthy Subjects
Author(s) -
Fang Annie F.,
Damle Bharat D.,
LaBadie Robert R.,
Crownover Penelope H.,
Hewlett Dial,
Glue Paul W.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
pharmacotherapy: the journal of human pharmacology and drug therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.227
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1875-9114
pISSN - 0277-0008
DOI - 10.1592/phco.28.1.42
Subject(s) - nelfinavir , omeprazole , pharmacokinetics , medicine , pharmacology , dosing , area under the curve , immunology , viral load , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , antiretroviral therapy
Study Objectives. To assess the effect of omeprazole on the multiple‐dose (steady‐state) pharmacokinetics and safety of nelfinavir, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of nelfinavir when administered alone and with omeprazole. Design. Open‐label, two‐period, single‐fixed‐sequence study. Setting. Clinical research unit of a large, teaching hospital. Participants. Twenty healthy volunteers (mean age 26 ± 9 yrs, range 18–48 yrs). Intervention. Subjects received nelfinavir 1250 mg every 12 hours for 4 days (period 1). After a 7‐day washout period, subjects were coadministered nelfinavir 1250 mg every 12 hours and omeprazole 40 mg every 24 hours for 4 days (period 2). Measurements and Main Results. The pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 were determined on day 4 of both periods. Plasma samples were assayed by a high‐performance liquid chromatography‐ultraviolet method for nelfinavir and M8 concentrations, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by using analytical software. In the presence of omeprazole, nelfinavir area under the concentration‐time curve over the dosing interval (AUC ẗ ), maximum observed plasma concentration (C max ), and minimum observed plasma concentration (C min ) were reduced by an average of 36%, 37%, and 39%, respectively, relative to administration of nelfinavir alone. The AUC ẗ , C max , and C min of M8 were reduced by an average of 92%, 89%, and 75%, respectively. The slopes of the terminal elimination phase of nelfinavir and M8 plasma concentration‐time curves were similar between treatments. Nelfinavir was well tolerated when administered alone and when coadministered with omeprazole. Conclusion. The observed reduction in the systemic exposure to both nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 after coadministration with omeprazole could result in loss of virologic control and potential emergence of drug resistance. Hence, omeprazole should not be coadministered to patients taking nelfinavir.