Premium
Implementation and Evaluation of Guidelines for Use of Enoxaparin as Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis after Major Trauma
Author(s) -
Devlin John W.,
Tyburski James G.,
Moed Berton
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
pharmacotherapy: the journal of human pharmacology and drug therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.227
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1875-9114
pISSN - 0277-0008
DOI - 10.1592/phco.21.7.740.34578
Subject(s) - medicine , deep vein , pulmonary embolism , thrombosis , surgery , venous thrombosis , low molecular weight heparin , enoxaparin sodium , anesthesia
Although enoxaparin is more efficacious than many other deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prevention strategies after trauma, its routine use in trauma patients at low risk for venous thrombosis is unlikely to be cost‐effective and may be deleterious if risk factors for bleeding are present. By way of consensus of opinion of trauma surgeons and pharmacists, enoxaparin DVT prophylaxis guidelines were developed, implemented, and evaluated. Fifty patients with major orthopedic or spinal trauma were followed throughout hospitalization. Enoxaparin use and frequency of DVT, pulmonary embolism (PE), thrombocytopenia, and enoxaparin‐related major bleeding (overt bleeding associated with a hemoglobin decrease ≥ 2 g/dl, need for ≥ 2 units of packed red blood cells, or need for surgery) were recorded. All pharmacist interventions pertaining to enoxaparin prophylaxis were collected. Average patient age was 45.6 ± 19.5 years, average Injury Severity Score was 19.0 ± 11.2, and average length of hospitalization was 14.3 ± 10.0 days. Most injuries were related to motor vehicles (52%) and falls (30%). Sites of injury were femur or tibia (52%), pelvis or acetabulum (32%), hip (20%), and spinal cord (12%). Two‐thirds (72%) of patients received enoxaparin during part of their hospital stay (on average, for 53% of the duration of hospitalization). Sequential compression devices and vena caval filters were used in 86% and 10% of patients, respectively. Duplex‐proven DVT occurred in two patients, and angiography‐proven PE developed in one patient. Enoxaparin‐related major bleeding and thrombocytopenia occurred in three and one patient(s), respectively. Pharmacists recommended enoxaparin initiation in nine (18%) patients and discontinuation of the agent in seven (14%) patients (one for bleeding; six for lack of indication). Most recommendations (78%) were accepted. Data from the 50 patients in this study showed fewer thrombotic complications but more bleeding than the frequencies found in controlled studies. It is unclear whether the large number of days that patients did not receive enoxaparin was due to fears of enoxaparin‐related bleeding or other factors.