z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The importance of control considerations for heat exchanger network synthesis: a case study
Author(s) -
Sérgio Oliveira,
Fábio S. Liporace,
O.Q.F. Araújo,
Eduardo M. Queiroz
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
brazilian journal of chemical engineering/brazilian journal of chemical engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.313
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1678-4383
pISSN - 0104-6632
DOI - 10.1590/s0104-66322001000200007
Subject(s) - controllability , context (archaeology) , heat exchanger , degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry) , process (computing) , control theory (sociology) , a priori and a posteriori , computer science , controller (irrigation) , control (management) , control engineering , mathematical optimization , engineering , mathematics , mechanical engineering , artificial intelligence , paleontology , agronomy , philosophy , physics , epistemology , quantum mechanics , biology , operating system
Cost optimization in the synthesis decision tree often leads to a reduced degree of freedom which degrades the process’s ability to reject disturbances as a consequence of low controllability. In fact, Heat Exchanger Networks (HENs) obtained by traditional synthesis procedures that ignore controllability aspects must be evaluated in this context a posteriori. The aim of this work was to develop a procedure that includes RGA and SVD measures of controllability, which are solely based on steady state information, thereby freeing the synthesis procedure of the cumbersome dynamic analysis. When a structure is defined during a traditional HEN synthesis procedure, a degree of freedom analysis is approached as a simulation problem. Next, an optimization is performed, since new variables are usually added to increase the degree of freedom of the HEN in order to render it controllable. A key point in the proposed procedure is the inference of controllability based on the proposed controllability measures, which also provide a control scheme by pairing controlled and manipulated variables during the process design. A HEN reported in the literature is used to illustrate the proposed procedure. The steady state simulator Aspen Plus and the dynamic simulator Aspen Dynamics (Aspentech, Inc.) were employed

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here