
Molecular biomarker profile of heart failure with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction in patients with type 2 diabetes
Author(s) -
Д. А. Лебедев,
Е. А. Лясникова,
А. А. Васильева,
Е. Ю. Васильева,
А. Ю. Бабенко,
Е. В. Шляхто
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
rossijskij kardiologičeskij žurnal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.141
H-Index - 14
eISSN - 2618-7620
pISSN - 1560-4071
DOI - 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3967
Subject(s) - medicine , ejection fraction , heart failure , glycated hemoglobin , diabetes mellitus , heart failure with preserved ejection fraction , cardiology , body mass index , type 2 diabetes , biomarker , ventricle , type 2 diabetes mellitus , gastroenterology , endocrinology , biochemistry , chemistry
Aim. To study molecular biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in combination with heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) and mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and compare the data obtained with clinical characteristics of myocardial remodeling. Materialandmethods. The study included 42 patients with T2D (men — 53%, mean age — 60 years) with clinical manifestations of class II HF: 29 patients with HFpEF (group 1) and 13 patients with HFmrEF (group 2). The control group consisted of 13 healthy people, which were comparable in sex and age and had a normal body mass index (BMI). Patients received stable glucose-lowering and optimal drug therapy for HF for 3 months prior to enrollment in the study. Patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF were comparable in clinical and demographic parameters, had glycated hemoglobin (HbA ) of 8,5% and 8,8%, respectively (p>0,05), increased BMI or grade I-II obesity. We studied following biomarkers: NT-proBNP, highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), sST2, galectin-3, procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide (PICP), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1). Results. Volumetric parameters of the left ventricle (LV),LV mass indexed to growth and NT-proBNP were higher in the group of HFpEF patients (p<0,05 for all). The concentrations of galectin-3, PICP were higher, and the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio decreased in patients with T2D compared with the control group (p<0,05 for all). PICP values were higher in patients with HFmrEF compared with patients with HFpEF (106,4 (85,4; 140,4) ng/ml vs 46,8 (12,6; 98,6 ng/ml), respectively, p=0,043). In patients with T2D and HF, a relationship was found between TIMP-1 andLV end-diastolic volume (r=-0,68; p=0,042). Conclusion. Patients with HFmrEF and T2D have higherLV volume and mass, higher concentrations of NT-proBNP and PICP in comparison with patients with HFpEF. The direction of MMP-9/TIMP-1 changes may reflect a decrease in antifibrotic processes. Further prospective studies on large samples using a multiple biomarker model are required in T2D and various HF phenotypes.