z-logo
Premium
Private Waterfront Householders Catch Less per Trip than other Fishers: Results of a Marine Recreational Survey
Author(s) -
Ashford Julian,
Jones Cynthia,
Fegley Lynn
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
transactions of the american fisheries society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.696
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 1548-8659
pISSN - 0002-8487
DOI - 10.1577/t09-139.1
Subject(s) - recreation , callinectes , fishery , geography , population , business , trips architecture , public access , survey data collection , environmental health , ecology , transport engineering , engineering , statistics , medicine , crustacean , library science , computer science , biology , mathematics
Marine recreational fishery surveys that estimate catch rate by sampling fishers who use public access often assume that fishers using private access and public access catch the same amount per trip taken. Despite the risk of bias, this assumption has not been tested by comparing private‐access users to the general population of fishers. During a survey of the recreational fishery for blue crabs Callinectes sapidus in Maryland, households from a list of waterfront properties were sampled by telephone at the same time as sampling of households from all coastal counties. Fishers from waterfront households overwhelmingly used private access. Waterfront households often caught a similar amount per month as coastal county households did, but catches for waterfront households were taken during more trips, resulting in catch rates that were 74% lower. Consequently, estimating catch rate by sampling only public‐access users results in a bias towards overestimation of the recreational catch. We strongly recommend that marine recreational surveys test this assumption for frames that only cover public‐access users, especially in regions with substantial private access.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here