Premium
An Improved Sibling Model for Forecasting Chum Salmon and Sockeye Salmon Abundance
Author(s) -
Haeseker Steven L.,
Dorner Brigitte,
Peterman Randall M.,
Su Zhenming
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
north american journal of fisheries management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1548-8675
pISSN - 0275-5947
DOI - 10.1577/m06-094.1
Subject(s) - oncorhynchus , sibling , abundance (ecology) , fishery , stock (firearms) , mean squared error , statistics , biology , mathematics , geography , economics , fish <actinopterygii> , management , archaeology
The sibling model is often one of the best methods for calculating preseason forecasts of adult return abundance (recruits) for populations of Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. This model forecasts abundance of a given age‐class for a given year based on the abundance of the previous age‐class in the previous year. When sibling relations fit historical data well, the sibling model generally performs better than other forecasting methods, such as stock–recruitment models. However, when sibling relations are weak, better forecasts are obtained by other models, such as naïve models that simply use an historical average. We evaluated the performance of a hybrid model that used quantitative criteria for switching between a sibling model and a naïve model when generating forecasts for 21 stocks of chum salmon O. keta and 37 stocks of sockeye salmon O. nerka in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. Compared with the standard sibling model, the hybrid model reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) of forecasts by an average of 27% for chum salmon stocks and 28% for sockeye salmon stocks. Compared with a naïve model, the hybrid model reduced the RMSE of forecasts by an average of 16% for chum salmon stocks and 15% for sockeye salmon stocks. Our results suggest that hybrid models can improve preseason forecasts and management of these two species.