Premium
Comparison of Two External Transmitter Types on Two Sizes of Bluegills and Yellow Perch
Author(s) -
Weimer Eric J.,
Duehr Jeremy P.,
Brown Michael L.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
north american journal of fisheries management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1548-8675
pISSN - 0275-5947
DOI - 10.1577/m05-149.1
Subject(s) - perch , transmitter , fish <actinopterygii> , biology , body weight , lepomis macrochirus , zoology , fishery , telecommunications , computer science , endocrinology , channel (broadcasting)
We compared two external transmitter styles on two size‐classes of bluegills Lepomis macrochirus (laterally compressed) and yellow perch Perca flavescens (fusiform) to determine the effects of (1) even distribution of transmitter weight and (2) transmitter weights above and below the recommended 2% of fish body weight. Fish were collected, acclimated for 3 weeks before transmitter attachment, measured for length and weight, Floy tagged, and randomly assigned to treatments (single‐sided transmitter, saddle transmitter, and control). Weight and length of individual fish were recorded every 5 d through day 20 and every 10 d through day 40. On day 40, we classified tag migration, wound redness, and organosomatic indices. Saddle transmitters required the longest handling time of all treatments and did not outperform single‐sided transmitters. On day 40, only small yellow perch had gained more weight with saddle transmitters than with single‐sided transmitters. Transmitters that exceeded 2% of fish weight slowed bluegill growth, whereas transmitters that were less than 2% of fish weight negatively affected yellow perch growth. Our results suggest that even the distribution of external transmitter weight may be less important than the method of attachment and transmitter weight. Development of improved attachment methods for saddle transmitters may prove beneficial for use in long‐term studies of small, fusiform fish.