Premium
Estimating Sockeye Salmon Smolt Flux and Abundance with Side‐Looking Sonar
Author(s) -
Mueller AnnaMaria,
Degan Don J.,
Kieser Robert,
Mulligan Tim
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
north american journal of fisheries management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1548-8675
pISSN - 0275-5947
DOI - 10.1577/m05-040.1
Subject(s) - sonar , oncorhynchus , transducer , echo (communications protocol) , beam (structure) , flux (metallurgy) , acoustics , transverse plane , abundance (ecology) , echo sounding , environmental science , geology , geodesy , physics , fishery , fish <actinopterygii> , optics , oceanography , computer science , materials science , biology , computer network , anatomy , metallurgy
Abundance estimates of out‐migrating sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka smolts are used to prepare preseason forecasts of adult returns and to set escapement goals. Here we describe a method for estimating smolt flux and abundance that uses side‐looking sonar. This method more efficiently covers the river cross section and is logistically easier to deploy than up‐looking sonar systems. To account for the skewed vertical distribution of smolts, we used a recently developed model for correcting echo integration bias associated with nonuniform target distribution. The correction is based on adjusting the integrated beam pattern for a given distribution of targets relative to the transverse cross section of the beam. We compared the results with estimates derived from video data and modeled the effect of three vertical distributions of smolts and three transducer pitch angles. The model estimated correction factors that ranged from 0.6 to 2.6. Correction factors were greater than 1 (which indicates negative bias in conventional echo integration) for smolt distributions skewed toward the edge of the beam and less than 1 (which indicates positive bias in conventional echo integration) for distributions skewed towards the center of the beam. For the scenarios modeled, the effect of the transducer pitch angle was small between the horizontal and −0.6° but increased nonlinearly as the angle increased. We conclude that, in the given application and at shallow transducer pitch angles, the bias in conventional echo integration is small and predictable enough to be corrected.