z-logo
Premium
The Use of Clove Oil as an Anesthetic for Rainbow Trout and Its Effects on Swimming Performance
Author(s) -
Anderson W. Gary,
McKinley R. Scott,
Colavecchia Maria
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
north american journal of fisheries management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1548-8675
pISSN - 0275-5947
DOI - 10.1577/1548-8675(1997)017<0301:tuocoa>2.3.co;2
Subject(s) - rainbow trout , anesthetic , anesthetic effect , fishery , juvenile , fish <actinopterygii> , food and drug administration , chemistry , biology , anesthesia , medicine , ecology , pharmacology
The only anesthetic registered in North America for use in fisheries science is 3‐aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester methanesulfate (tricaine or MS‐222). Although MS‐222 is a very effective anesthesia for several fish species, its application in the field is limited because U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines demand a 21‐d withdrawal period after exposure to MS‐222 before fish can be released and enter the food chain. As a consequence, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) has been used as a substitute anesthetic; however, induction and recovery times with CO 2 are long, and anesthesia is shallow in comparison with MS‐222. We compared the efficacy of MS‐222 to that of clove oil, a naturally occurring substance, for use as an anesthetic for juvenile and adult rainbow trout Onchorhynchus mykiss . Clove oil was as effective as MS‐222 in inducing anesthesia in both age‐groups. Furthermore, exposure to either clove oil or MS‐222 at the concentrations tested was not detrimental to critical swimming speed of juvenile or adult rainbow trout. We propose that clove oil be considered as an alternative to MS‐222 for use as a fish anesthetic.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here