Premium
Risks of Introductions of Marine Fishes: Reply to Briggs
Author(s) -
Courtenay Walter R.,
Collette Bruce B.,
Essington Timothy E.,
Hilborn Ray,
Orr James W.,
Pauly Daniel,
Randall John E.,
SmithVaniz William F.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
fisheries
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.725
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1548-8446
pISSN - 0363-2415
DOI - 10.1577/1548-8446-34.4.181
Subject(s) - overfishing , fishery , invertebrate , rebuttal , geography , biology , fish <actinopterygii> , archaeology
This is a rebuttal to a publication by John C. Briggs in the April 2008 issue of Fisheries in which he suggested introducing fishes and invertebrates from the North Pacific into the North Atlantic to increase diversity toward improving fisheries in the latter. We argue otherwise for reasons that Briggs downplayed or never considered. Using examples of introductions within the Pacific and the Atlantic, and movements of species from the Pacific to the Atlantic, we provide a record of failures and damage or dangers to native species from the few introductions that became successful. We argue that a lack of diversity of fishes and invertebrates in the North Atlantic versus that of the North Pacific is not the problem to be corrected by introductions as Briggs suggested. A record of overfishing and management policies is the problem in the North Atlantic. Introductions from the North Pacific to the North Atlantic are not worth the costs or the environmental risks involved.