Premium
The Status of Coldwater Fishery Management in the United States: An Overview of State Programs
Author(s) -
Epifanio John
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
fisheries
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.725
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1548-8446
pISSN - 0363-2415
DOI - 10.1577/1548-8446(2000)025<0013:tsocfm>2.0.co;2
Subject(s) - business , agency (philosophy) , fisheries management , fishery , management by objectives , resource (disambiguation) , habitat , natural resource , environmental resource management , environmental planning , geography , political science , ecology , fishing , economics , marketing , computer science , biology , computer network , philosophy , epistemology , law
In 1996, fishery administrators from every U.S. state were surveyed about an array of coldwater management topics ranging from the composition of coldwater fishery resources, to threats facing resources, to expertise and strategies employed by the agency. Administrators in 49 states returned completed surveys and provided information on the general challenges facing coldwater fishery resources and the conditions under which these resources are managed. For example, 47 states managed coldwater fisheries. Of these, 38 cited habitat‐related problems as the most commonly identified obstacles to maintaining self‐sustaining trout or salmon populations. Yet in spite of this observation, funding for aquatic habitat programs through fishery management agencies was generally but a fraction of their budgets. In contrast, the states cumulatively operated 369 coldwater hatcheries, which consumed sizable portions of their annual budgets, and licensed an additional 1,200 private coldwater facilities nationwide. Twelve states had assessed the environmental impacts and 11 states the economic impacts of their facilities. In terms of resource planning, 25 states managed coldwater resources under the umbrella of a strategic plan, and 10 managed on an ecosystem‐ or watershed‐based approach. Ultimately, these and other facts suggest a misalignment between the problems facing many coldwater fisheries and management programs in use by some state agencies to counter these problems. This disconnect is likely due to a mix of our profession's institutional history, the way agencies are funded, and public expectation; therefore, overcoming this disconnect will require an objective presentation of facts and open dialogue among professionals and stake‐holders regarding management goals and the tools used to reach these goals.