Open AccessThe Dimensions of Partisanship in Canada
Author(s) -
Eric M. Uslaner
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
american review of politics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2374-779X
pISSN - 2374-7781
DOI - 10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1992.13.0.445-463
Subject(s) - optimal distinctiveness theory , identification (biology) , lisrel , dual (grammatical number) , political science , voting , dimension (graph theory) , voting behavior , public administration , positive economics , political economy , sociology , social psychology , law , structural equation modeling , psychology , economics , politics , art , statistics , botany , mathematics , literature , pure mathematics , biology
Canadians are said to have weaker partisanship than Americans. Most particularly, many Canadians identify with different parties at the federal and provincial level. To what extent does this dual identification form part of a syndrome of weak partisanship, as institutionalist theories of Canadian partisanship would suggest? LISREL modeling of attitudes toward parties in the 1974-1979 panel of the Canadian National Election Studies finds little support for such an institutionalist view. Instead, Canadians have complex schemata for evaluating parties. Dual identification forms a distinct dimension. There are four other factors: temporal stability for both party identification and voting behavior, the strength of identification at both the federal and provincial levels, and separate dimensions for federal and provincial partisanship. These results provide support for a cultural/historical account, especially given the distinctiveness of schemata for Quebec and British Columbia.