z-logo
Premium
A path through the equivalence minefield
Author(s) -
Eddy John W,
Proctor Selene,
Lambert Alice,
Qureshi Sarah
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
the obstetrician and gynaecologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1744-4667
pISSN - 1467-2561
DOI - 10.1576/toag.10.4.257.27443
Subject(s) - attendance , medical education , curriculum , specialty , path (computing) , equivalence (formal languages) , computer science , psychology , medicine , family medicine , pedagogy , political science , law , mathematics , programming language , discrete mathematics
•  Entry to the General Medical Council specialist register via equivalence requires extensive evidence, based on specialty‐specific guidance. •  Candidates who discuss their applications in advance with the Head of Specialist Registration at the RCOG have a higher chance of entering the register. •  The curriculum vitae (CV) must be supported by validated documents. •  Referees must take reasonable steps to verify information.Learning objectives:•  To understand the process of application to the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board. •  To be aware of the evidence required. •  To understand the pitfalls of writing a reference.Ethical issues:•  References should conform to the General Medical Council's good medical practice guidelines. •  Patient data should not be included in the application. •  Those signing off clinical practice or attendance at courses should have seen evidence of attendance or completion.Please cite this article as: Eddy JW, Proctor S, Lambert A, Qureshi S. A path through the equivalence minefield. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2008;10:257–262.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here