z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Healthcare Providers’ Awareness and Perceptions of Competency Requirements in Central Venous Catheter Insertion
Author(s) -
Elaine Cohen,
Jeffrey H. Barsuk,
Joelle R. Hertz,
Diane B. Wayne,
Yasuharu Okuda,
Debi Mitra,
William C. McGaghie,
Kenzie A. Cameron
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
mededpublish
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2312-7996
DOI - 10.15694/mep.2018.0000012.1
Subject(s) - competence (human resources) , documentation , grounded theory , perception , health care , veterans affairs , nursing , curriculum , medicine , qualitative research , medical education , psychology , political science , social psychology , pedagogy , neuroscience , law , social science , sociology , computer science , programming language
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. BackgroundStudies show that medical residents do not feel comfortable and lack the skills and confidence to perform common bedside procedures. Regulatory bodies often require a set number of procedures to determine resident competence, yet medical providers' knowledge of competency guidelines are less well known. This study aimed to qualitatively assess existing practices relevant to documentation of competency in central venous catheter (CVC) insertion and explore healthcare providers' awareness and perceptions of those practices at their institutions.MethodsThe authors performed a qualitative study at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) from February to December 2014 as part of a larger project related to the dissemination of a simulation-based CVC insertion curriculum. Two authors conducted interviews with hospital staff (including attending physicians, nurses, and residents) at selected VAMCs. Recordings of interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using a grounded theory approach and constant comparative techniques.ResultsTwenty-six participants were interviewed at six VAMCs. Participants reported varying perspectives regarding their institutions' policies about CVC insertion. Four major themes emerged: (1) knowledge of institutional policy; (2) competency by numbers; (3) documentation of competency; and (4) perceptions of competency measures. Participants reported concern about the reliability of these policies and measures of competence.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that healthcare providers' knowledge and perceptions about institutional requirements for procedural competency vary widely. Our findings suggest the need for establishment of consistent competency policies based on evidence-based practices, and highlight the need for increased communication regarding individual institutional policies. Integration of rigorous simulation-based education, implemented consistently across institutions, can provide a reliable mechanism to train and assess procedural competence and ensure patient safety.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom