Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting | Zendy

Reza Vahid Roudsari | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Food for Thought: A New Compromised Method of Standard Setting

Author(s) -

Reza Vahid Roudsari

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

mededpublish

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 2312-7996

DOI - 10.15694/mep.2016.000085

Subject(s) - judgement , set (abstract data type) , psychology , index (typography) , social psychology , applied psychology , computer science , political science , law , world wide web , programming language

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. A number of standard setting methods are in use with their own strengths and limitations. Angoff is a popular method worldwide but very demanding on resources. This paper explores if the judgement of the Angoff panels of judges can been explained by post-hoc psychometrics. Furthermore the paper examines if such correlations can be used to standard set exam papers based on their psychometric item difficulty and discrimination index.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research