Open AccessThe Fourth Ecumenical Council and the Issue of the Primacy of the Bishop of Rome
Author(s) -
Mikhail Gratsianskiy
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
vestnik volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. seriâ 4. istoriâ, regionovedenie, meždunarodnye otnošeniâ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.308
H-Index - 2
eISSN - 2312-8704
pISSN - 1998-9938
DOI - 10.15688/jvolsu4.2019.6.20
Subject(s) - bishops , honour , presidency , emperor , law , research council , security council , political science , general assembly , council of ministers , power (physics) , sociology , history , philosophy , politics , european union , ancient history , linguistics , physics , quantum mechanics , government (linguistics) , business , economic policy
. Despite multiple references and partial treatment of the proposed topic in scholarly literature, the necessity of its full-scaled analysis on the basis of the Acts of the Fourth Ecumenical Council held in Chalcedon in 451 still remains.Methods. The paper analyzes the entire published Acts and determines all relevant passages concerning the characteristics of the Pope’s pretensions to the universal primacy in the Church and the limits of their acceptability by the participants of the Council.Analysis. The author undertakes the research of the consequent sessions of the Council and analyzes relevant data comparing the declarations and claims of the papal legates and their actual perception by the imperial dignitaries, who were presiding over the Council, and the bishops.Results. The presented research demonstrates that Pope’s claims to the universal power within the Church were actually discarded by the Council and the representatives of the emperor in multiple ways. Firstly, the legates (vicarii) of the Pope were not trusted with the actual presidency over the Council (except in one session). Secondly, pope’s decisions, which had been taken before the Council and which the legates had been instructed to implement, were put under reexamination through the Council and were passed as conciliar decisions, often with no reference to the pope as their initiator. Thirdly, the Council didn’t accept certain elements of the pope’s title, which reflected his universal claims. In general, the Council of Chalcedon was the first to promote the principle of the primacy of honour that was bestowed on Rome and Constantinople equally.