z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Enigma Politisasi Teks antara Otoritarian dan Egalitarian
Author(s) -
Hijrian A. Prihantoro
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
mutawatir
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2502-6321
pISSN - 2088-7523
DOI - 10.15642/mutawatir.2017.7.1.166-191
Subject(s) - interpretation (philosophy) , ideology , epistemology , dialectic , meaning (existential) , trace (psycholinguistics) , power (physics) , relation (database) , politics , philosophy , authoritarianism , sociology , linguistics , political science , democracy , law , computer science , physics , quantum mechanics , database
This article lies on the basic assumption of the heavy influence of power relation in interpreting religious texts. That is because the meaning of religious texts is often determined by the framework of interpretation and the model used by the exegetes. The discursive relations between the exegete and his tendency of political interest in the dialectical discourse of texts (al-naṣṣ ) and power (al-sulṭah), are likely potential to produce a rhythm of meaning that is non-humanitarian (al-lâ insânîyah). As a result, religious texts that should be interpreted in egalitarian sense are of marginalized. This study attempts to trace the basic paradigm of the interpretation of the khilâfah as an aqidah to the power as political ideology until the emergence of the movement of takfîrî. These three terms are a series of interpretive concepts in the framework of naz}arîyat al-tafwîd} al-ilâhî which are translated into the theory of divine authority. At this point, the enigma of politicizing religious texts comes into two models of interpretation: authoritarian and egalitarian.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here