Premium
Comparison of Photosensitizer (AlPcS 2 ) Quantification Techniques: In Situ Fluorescence Microsampling Versus Tissue Chemical Extraction ¶
Author(s) -
Lee Claudia C.,
Pouge Brian W.,
Strawbridge Rendy R.,
Moodie Karen L.,
Bartholomew Luanna R.,
Burke Gregory C.,
Jack Hoopes P.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
photochemistry and photobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.818
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1751-1097
pISSN - 0031-8655
DOI - 10.1562/0031-8655(2001)0740453copaqt2.0.co2
Subject(s) - photosensitizer , in situ , fluorescence , chemistry , extraction (chemistry) , chromatography , photochemistry , optics , physics , organic chemistry
A noninvasive in situ fluorescence‐based method for the quantification of the photosensitizer chloroaluminum disulfonated phthalocyanine was compared to the highly accurate but nonreal time ex vivo spectrofluorometry method. Our in vivo fluorescence technique is designed to allow real‐time assessment of photosensitizer in tumor and normal tissues and therefore temporally optimal light delivery. Laser‐induced fluorescence was used to measure photosensitizer concentration from multiple microscopic regions of tissue. Ex vivo chemical extraction was used to quantify photosensitizer concentration in the same volume of tissue. The amount of photosensitizer in the vascular and/or parenchymal compartments of skeletal muscle and liver was determined by quantifying fluorescent signal in vivo, ex vivo and after blood removal. Confocal microscopy was used to spatially document photosensitizer localization 30 min and 24 h after delivery. While a linear correlation can exist between the fluorescence intensity measured by our fiber‐optic bundle system and actual tissue concentration, temporal changes to this calibration line exist as the photosensitizer changes its partitioning fraction between the blood (vasculature) and the tissue parenchyma. In situ photosensitizer fluorescence microsampling (dosimetry) systems can be performed in real time and linearly correlated to actual tissue concentration with minimal intertissue variance. Tissue‐specific differences may require temporal alterations in the calibration.