Open AccessOdmienny standard ochrony prawnej w elektronicznym postępowaniu upominawczym – uzasadniona potrzeba czy arbitralność ustawodawcy?
Author(s) -
Aneta Mendrek,
Polska Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
acta iuridica resoviensia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2720-0574
DOI - 10.15584/actaires.2021.1.9
Subject(s) - legislator , writ , law , order (exchange) , subject (documents) , payment , civil code , political science , legislation , law and economics , computer science , sociology , business , library science , finance , world wide web
A different standard of legal protection granted in accelerated proceedings, which includes electronic writ proceedings (EWP), may and should be justified by the nature or subject of a given procedure. However, the separate lex specialis provisions introduced in the proceedings as compared to the solutions of ordinary proceedings may not lead to arbitrary limitations of the right to a court. The EWP, in the form given to it by the amendment of 4 July 2019, has largely been reduced to a sui generis court order for payment procedure, allowing for the pursuit of undisputed pecuniary claims. At the same time, it is still a way to obtain an enforce able title. From this perspective, the different standards introduced by the legislator resulting from the provisions of Art. 505 34 § 1 and 2 and art. 505 37 § 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The article is devoted to the analysis of the above-mentioned regulations and assessing whether the nature or subject of EWP justifies the differences provided for therein.