z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The uniqueness of the best non-symmetric $L_1$-approximant for continuous functions with values in $\mathbb{R}^m_p$
Author(s) -
M.Ye. Tkachenko,
V.M. Traktynska
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
researches in mathematics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2664-5009
pISSN - 2664-4991
DOI - 10.15421/242104
Subject(s) - uniqueness , subspace topology , combinatorics , space (punctuation) , mathematics , linear subspace , matrix (chemical analysis) , mathematical analysis , physics , pure mathematics , philosophy , linguistics , materials science , composite material
The article considers the questions of the uniqueness of the best non-symmetric $L_1$-approximations of continuous functions with values in $\mathbb{R}^m_p, p\in (1;+\infty )$ by elements of the two-dimensional subspace  $H_2= \mathrm{span} \{1, g_{a,b}\}$, where $$g_{a,b}(x)=\left\{ \begin{matrix} -b\cdot (x-1)^2, & x\in [0;1), & \\0, & x\in [1;a-1), & (a\geq 2, b>0),\\(x-a+1)^2,& x\in [a-1,a],&\end{matrix} \right.$$It is obtained that when $b\in (0;1)\cup (1;+\infty), a\geq 2$, the subspace $H_2$ is a unicity space of the best $(\alpha ,\beta )$-approximations for continuous on the $[0;a]$ functions with values in the space  $\mathbb{R}^m_p, p\in (1;+\infty )$. In case $b=1$, $a\geq 4$ it is proved that the subspace  $H_2$ is not a unicity subspace of the best non-symmetric approximations for these functions.Received results summarize the previously obtained Strauss results for the real functions in the case $\alpha = \beta = 1$, as well as the results of Babenko and Glushko for the the best $(\alpha ,\beta )$-approximation for continuous functions on a segment with values in the space $\mathbb{R}^m_p, p\in (1;+\infty )$.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom