Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is Less More? | Zendy

Rik Rozemeijer | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is Less More?

Author(s) -

Rik Rozemeijer

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

us cardiology review

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.148

H-Index - 3

eISSN - 1758-390X

pISSN - 1758-3896

DOI - 10.15420/usc.2018.4.2

Subject(s) - medicine , conventional pci , percutaneous coronary intervention , duration (music) , acute coronary syndrome , cardiology , randomized controlled trial , clinical trial , intensive care medicine , myocardial infarction , art , literature

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the latest-generation drug-eluting stents remains a matter of debate. Evidence suggests short regimens of DAPT are favorable for patients with a low ischemic risk, while those at a high risk of ischemia may benefit from taking DAPT for a long duration. An individually assessed risk profile is pivotal in guiding DAPT duration. Risk scores may aid individual patient DAPT decisions, but the value they add to clinical outcomes still needs to be established in a prospective randomized trial. This review aims to provide an overview on DAPT, evaluate the available evidence on DAPT duration with a description of common pitfalls of trial interpretation, and assess available tools for individual risk assessment in patients scheduled for PCI with the latest-generation DES.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research