z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Baby’s First Years: Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Poverty Reduction in the United States
Author(s) -
Kimberly G. Noble,
Katherine Magnuson,
Lisa A. Gennetian,
Greg J. Duncan,
Hirokazu Yoshikawa,
Nathan A. Fox,
Sarah HalpernMeekin
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
pediatrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.611
H-Index - 345
eISSN - 1098-4275
pISSN - 0031-4005
DOI - 10.1542/peds.2020-049702
Subject(s) - poverty , medicine , earnings , randomized controlled trial , disadvantage , poverty threshold , early childhood , child development , cash transfers , poverty reduction , developmental psychology , psychiatry , psychology , economic growth , economics , finance , surgery , political science , law
Childhood economic disadvantage is associated with lower cognitive and social-emotional skills, reduced educational attainment, and lower earnings in adulthood. Despite these robust correlations, it is unclear whether family income is the cause of differences observed between children growing up in poverty and their more fortunate peers or whether these differences are merely due to the many other aspects of family life that co-occur with poverty. Baby's First Years is the first randomized controlled trial in the United States designed to identify the causal impact of poverty reduction on children's early development. A total of 1000 low-income mothers of newborns were enrolled in the study and began receiving a monthly unconditional cash gift for the first several years of their children's lives. Mothers were randomly assigned to receive either a large monthly cash gift or a nominal monthly cash gift. All monthly gifts are administered via debit card and can be freely spent with no restrictions. Baby's First Years aims to answer whether poverty reduction in early childhood (1) improves children's developmental outcomes and promotes healthier brain functioning, and (2) improves family functioning and better enables parents to support child development. Here we present the rationale and design of the study as well as potential implications for science and policy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here