z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Witnessing as an alternative approach of religious truth. A comment on Rawls’s idea of comprehensive doctrines
Author(s) -
Peter Jonkers
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
fìlosofsʹka dumka
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2522-9346
pISSN - 2522-9338
DOI - 10.15407/fd2022.01.036
Subject(s) - existentialism , religious pluralism , pluralism (philosophy) , epistemology , christianity , politics , sign (mathematics) , philosophy , sociology , law , political science , religious studies , mathematical analysis , mathematics
The paper offers a critical examination of the term ‘reasonable comprehensive doctrines’, which is a key term in Rawls’s Political Liberalism. It is argued that this term is not accurate anymore to catch the current shape of religious and secular worldviews and the nature of their truth claims, because it focuses too much on the doctrinal character of religious truth, which plays a central role in Christianity but not in many other religions and secular worldviews. However, sociologists of religion and philosopher Charles Taylor have pointed out that a shift in people’s attitude towards religion has been taking place since the last decades of the twentieth century, resulting in a more existential and less doctrinal approach to religious truth. This focus on ‘lived religion’, inspiring the faithful put their lives in the sign of (the truth of) these doctrines, explains why Rawls’s doctrinal approach falls short of expectations in finding a response to the challenge of religious pluralism. Yet, in the conclusion of this paper it is shown that Rawls also values witnessing as an alternative, more existential approach to religious truth, although it plays a rather marginal role in his work.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here