Open AccessInstitute of Philosophy: Traditions and Innovations
Author(s) -
Anatoliy Yermolenko,
Serhii Yosypenko
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
fìlosofsʹka dumka
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2522-9346
pISSN - 2522-9338
DOI - 10.15407/fd2021.04.013
Subject(s) - ukrainian , institutionalisation , philosophy education , social science , sociology , politics , independence (probability theory) , social philosophy , style (visual arts) , philosophy of sport , epistemology , political science , philosophy , law , social relation , linguistics , statistics , mathematics , archaeology , history
The article is devoted to the historical and philosophical analysis of the unique and paradigmatic role of the H.S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in the philosophical life of Ukraine for 75 years since its foundation. The authors outline its role in the process of institutionalizing philosophy in Ukraine from the time of the domination of the dogmas of Soviet Marxism to the introduction of current research traditions in modern Ukrainian philosophy. The continuity and peculiarities of the change of generations of researchers in the field of philosophy and the involvement of Ukrainian philosophical thought in the world intellectual discourse are studied. The article's authors reveal the gradual formation of the Kyiv philosophical tradition, the role of the Institute's leadership in the style and nature of scientific research of certain periods. Particular attention is paid to the institutionalization of new research areas at the Institute, such as political philosophy, philosophy of language and speech, which belong to the leading paradigm of modern philosophy. Attention is paid to the cooperation of the Institute with domestic scientific and educational institutions, its international relations. The status of the leading professional publications, which became significant both in Soviet times and during independence, is highlighted. Finally, the article notes the role and tasks of the Institute in modern social discourse, focuses on the values, the preservation of which is taken care of by representatives of the Institute.