Open AccessControl banding assessment of exposure of offset printing workers to organic solvents
Author(s) -
Tsukahara Teruomi,
Miyauchi Hiroyuki,
Kuwada Daisuke,
Kikuchi Tomoko,
Tsuda Yoko,
Yanagiba Yukie,
Arito Heihachiro,
Nomiyama Tetsuo
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of occupational health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.664
H-Index - 59
ISSN - 1348-9585
DOI - 10.1539/joh.15-0324-br
Subject(s) - hazardous waste , occupational hygiene , environmental health , hazard , hazardous substance , hazard analysis , petroleum industry , environmental science , waste management , medicine , occupational safety and health , engineering , environmental engineering , reliability engineering , chemistry , organic chemistry , pathology
Objectives We aimed to assess the exposure of offset printing workers to hazardous substances in the rinsing processes of small‐sized companies using a control banding method. Methods We obtained half‐year amounts of hazardous substances purchased through a questionnaire survey and the hazardous information from the safety data sheets (SDSs) and related literature. Results The amount of petroleum kerosine and carbon hydride markedly increased in 2013 compared with that in 2010. In contrast, the amount of dichloromethane (DCM) decreased in 2013, and 1,2‐dichloropropane (DCP) was not used in either 2010 or 2013. Mineral oil and xylene were allocated to Hazard Group D and judged to require Control Approach 3. In addition to DCM with Global Harmonization System's carcinogenic category 1, mildly treated mineral oil and solvent naphtha, allocated into Hazard Group E, are carcinogenic to humans and were judged to require Control Approach 4. There are two limitations of the control banding assessment: first, only limited and scarce hazard information could be obtained from SDSs, and second, safe‐sided judgment for control technology for industrial hygiene. Conclusion Small‐sized enterprises are encouraged to implement control banding assessment for hazardous substances and to access expert advice available from Regional Industrial Health Centers. Easy access to appropriate expert advice is important to compensate for the limited and scarce hazard information and safe‐sided judgment for control technology for Control Approaches 3 and 4.